Date: [INSERT DATE]
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
To
whom it may concern.
Dear
Sir or Madam
I
hope this letter and the accompanying notice finds you well and leaves you
better. You will find attached one Notice
of Understanding and Intent and
Claim of Right which contains seven
pages, in addition to this cover letter, which contains two pages, (this and
one other). I have crafted this Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of
Right for the purpose of avoiding future conflicts when I begin exercising the
rights claimed therein. It is my desire and intent to live freely, peacefully,
and within community standards, and do so in an orderly and honourable manor,
but without license, permission, restrictions or governance from your
organisations. I am not “anti-government” nor do I advocate lawless behaviour,
much to the contrary I wish to prove through my actions that good, orderly,
reasonable behaviour need not be mandated to exist. I think government has its
place in remedying conflict, and regulating those who wish to operate in
limited liability. I wish to operate in full liability and without government
interference. I do not wish to be a “thorn in your side” and I intend to fulfil
my duties to protect the freedom of speech by improving the Internet and to use
innovation, and creativity to make [INSERT TOWN NAME WHERE YOU LIVE], The United Kingdom, and the world at large a nicer place
to live; needless to say if you are not bothering me I will have no time to
bother you.
If
you are bureaucratic in nature, these ideas may come as a bit of a surprise,
but I think that with some observation, you will find that all of the creative
energy that shapes our world comes from people who choose to act differently
from their neighbours, and everyone who hasn't read all of the
“bodies-of-words” that may have authority over them, lives in fear of being
tried for violating something which they don't understand, and only does things
that have already been done and proven “safe” with the government. Thus, the
creativity of the people, and the productivity of a country, can be subverted
by its government holding the people accountable for too much “law”.
Before
literacy was widespread, law was written down, but the few who could read could
interpret it however they pleased, or even make it up when telling the law to
the illiterate. Literacy is a prized skill here because we understand that
without being able to read we are at the mercy of those who can. Neither I, nor
anyone I know, nor even anyone I have heard about, has read every word in the
law library. Are we returning to an age when the majority is subjugated by the
minority who understands the law?
Regardless
of the overall trends, I have made a good-faith effort to read, and understand
every law that may pertain to me, and have found this task to be beyond my
abilities. I could not even find a map of which law applies to whom. I found
deceptive language in the form of words, which looked like they meant one thing
in context but, upon looking them up in a law dictionary, I found they actually
mean something completely different. I found numerous references such as “has
as much authority as a” which requires anyone who wants to understand the law
to constantly need to ask more questions, amounting to “rabbit trails” of
paperwork to follow in order to gain any meaningful insight. I found the words
in the law library to be vague and very easy to construe in many different
ways. I have a sound understanding of computers, and software, and it is my
understanding that if the papers in the law library were software to run a
programme, when taken as a whole, it would cause the system to crash. If
somebody purposely wrote vague statutes in order that they would have multiple
meanings, one or more of which would lead a reasonable person to violate the de facto Constitution the United Kingdom
if acting as a public servant, then somebody has committed fraud.
Whether
or not fraud was committed, I cannot read, understand, nor in good faith try to
follow, all of the statutes, regulations, orders, and other words that have
been written without my consent.
The
remedy I have found is to make known to the world my understanding and intent,
and claim the rights, which I believe to be mine. Any who disagree have an
opportunity to discuss and negotiate, but those who silently wait out their
opportunity and then take legal action once I begin exercising my rights are
acting like predators, lying in wait and maximising conflict - and they are dishonouring
my notice and dishonouring a main pillar of the Rule of Law, which clearly
states that “conflict is avoidable and undesirable”.
I
hope this letter causes you to think deeply and I hope you understand that your
authority depends on the moral high ground, for your own credibility, and that
of your government as a whole.
Your
legal-system was designed to destroy the lives of those who make their living
doing injury upon others, and rightly so, but if you seek out peaceful claimers
of rights, and persecute them, you will create a political movement, and freedom
should only be for those mature enough to accept responsibilities. However, by
agreeing to coexist peacefully, you may preserve your authority, and colour of
authority for a long time to come.
In
closing, I bid you fare-thee-well and wish you all the best in your endeavours.
Without ill will, malice aforethought, frivolity or vexation, but with the
intent of avoiding future conflicts or disputes by stating clearly my
understanding and intentions, and by claiming my rights before exercising them.
I
hereby sign this document with the "symbol" I have adopted below, to
seal my present intention to authenticate this document.
Signed and dated on this, the [DATE] day of May in the year of our Lord 2009.
Sign your name here in
RED INK
_______________________________________________
Freeman-on-the-land [FIRST NAME] of the family of [FAMILY NAME]
No comments:
Post a Comment